C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate

The objectives of this synthesis are (1) to review the factors that influence the ecological, geographical, and palaeoecological distributions of plants possessing C₄ photosynthesis and (2) to propose a hypothesis/model to explain both the distribution of C₄ plants with respect to temperature and CO₂ and why C₄ photosynthesis is relatively uncommon in dicotyledonous plants (hereafter dicots), especially in comparison with its widespread distribution in monocotyledonous species (hereafter monocots). Our goal is to stimulate discussion of the factors controlling distributions of C₄ plants today, historically, and under future elevated CO₂ environments. Understanding the distributions of C₃/C₄ plants impacts not only primary productivity, but also the distribution, evolution, and migration of both invertebrates and vertebrates that graze on these plants. Sixteen separate studies all indicate that the current distributions of C₄ monocots are tightly correlated with temperature: elevated temperatures during the growing season favor C₄ monocots. In contrast, the seven studies on C₄ dicot distributions suggest that a different environmental parameter, such as aridity (combination of temperature and evaporative potential), more closely describes their distributions. Differences in the temperature dependence of the quantum yield for CO₂ uptake (light-use efficiency) of C₃ and C₄ species relate well to observed plant distributions and light-use efficiency is the only mechanism that has been proposed to explain distributional differences in C₃/C₄ monocots. Modeling of C₃ and C₄ light-use efficiencies under different combinations of atmospheric CO₂ and temperature predicts that C₄-dominated ecosystems should not have expanded until atmospheric CO₂ concentrations reached the lower levels that are thought to have existed beginning near the end of the Miocene. At that time, palaeocarbonate and fossil data indicate a simultaneous, global expansion of C₄-dominated grasslands. The C₄ monocots generally have a higher quantum yield than C₄ dicots and it is proposed that leaf venation patterns play a role in increasing the light-use efficiency of most C₄ monocots. The reduced quantum yield of most C₄ dicots is consistent with their rarity, and it is suggested that C₄ dicots may not have been selected until CO₂ concentrations reached their lowest levels during glacial maxima in the Quaternary. Given the intrinsic light-use efficiency advantage of C₄ monocots, C₄ dicots may have been limited in their distributions to the warmest ecosystems, saline ecosystems, and/or to highly disturbed ecosystems. All C₄ plants have a significant advantage over C₃ plants under low atmospheric CO₂ conditions and are predicted to have expanded significantly on a global scale during full-glacial periods, especially in tropical regions. Bog and lake sediment cores as well as pedogenic carbonates support the hypothesis that C₄ ecosystems were more extensive during the last glacial maximum and then decreased in abundance following deglaciation as atmospheric CO₂ levels increased.