Propulsion systems comparison for geostationary spacecraft
Abstract
Solid and liquid apogee boost motors, and ion and hydrazine auxiliary propulsion systems are described. Propulsion system configurations which reduce overall weight are indicated. It is found that for small satellites, hydrazine orbit control thrust systems can be replaced by bipropellant systems. Bipropellant engines are attractive for large satellites. Greatest weight reductions are predicted by using ion engines.
- Publication:
-
In CNES The Future of Launchers in Europe
- Pub Date:
- 1982
- Bibcode:
- 1982cnes.rept..361V
- Keywords:
-
- Apogee Boost Motors;
- Geos Satellites (Esa);
- Propulsion System Configurations;
- Propulsion System Performance;
- Auxiliary Propulsion;
- Booster Rocket Engines;
- Hydrazine Engines;
- Ion Engines;
- Propellant Mass Ratio;
- Weight Reduction;
- Launch Vehicles and Space Vehicles